Private Aide Ran Hillary’s Email Server Without Security Clearance

“He has no security clearance — and he had access to every single email either sent by or received by the secretary of state of the United States for four years,” Morris said. “All of it, every one of them.

A personal aide to former President Bill Clinton with no security clearance maintained Hillary Clinton’s…

Exclusive: Elizabeth Warren Listed as ‘Woman of Color’ by Harvard Journal in 1993


Breitbart News has uncovered exclusive new evidence that in the spring of 1993, three years before Harvard Law School first publicly stated she was

Obama’s naive idealism has caused havoc as America makes the same mistakes over and over again

Barack Obama is a classic case study in foreign policy idealism. Indeed, one of his favorite quotations is about the arrow of history: “The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.” He has spent nearly eight years trying to advance that arc of justice. Hence his initial “apology tour,” that burst of confessional soul-searching abroad about America and its sins, from slavery to the loss of our moral compass after 9/11. Friday’s trip to Hiroshima completes the arc.

How do you distinguish a foreign policy “idealist” from a “realist,” an optimist from a pessimist? Ask one question: Do you believe in the arrow of history? Or to put it…

We are honoring our war dead on Memorial Day and Obama is apologizing to Japan in Japan.

  Rush Limbaugh's photo.

Rush Limbaugh

Obama: Did he or did he not apologize, in your opinion, when he went over there to Japan and Hiroshima?


Middle School Reading Lists 100 Years Ago vs. Today Show How Much Standards Have Declined

This is why in a hundred years, we’ve gone from teaching Latin and Greek in high school to teaching remedial English in college.


Andrea Mitchell Continuously Has To Correct Clinton Supporter Rep. Schiff About The IG Report


THIS IS DAMNING: Secretary Clinton Diverted 100% of State Department Secure Communications and Placed American Assets in Exceptionally Grave Danger

Jimmy Minnish

The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report produced by a President Obama appointee is an internal State Department Report that profoundly contradicts Clinton’s account of events spoken over the last 18 months.  

Hillary Clinton totally disregarded national security in an attempt to guard her own personal communications from any prying eyes.  As usual Hillary proves to be a liar and a self indulgent liberal who placed her own wants above American security.  

For her reckless and calculated actions at a minimum Secretary Clinton should lose her security clearance and the

Intelligence community wants Clinton’s security clearance suspended

which will assure she is not qualified for public office; and at a maximum receive a sentence of not less than 10 years in federal prison. This tees it up for the FBI findings that will naturally be covered in reference materials in this post. 

If you trust Mrs. Bill Clinton in any leadership role then you yourself are not making a wise decision.  There is no doubt in my military mind that Mrs. Bill Clinton will be brought to justice by President Donald J. Trump if this Justice Department fails to act on Clinton’s unlawful acts.

The public system Secretary Clinton and her aides used was outside of a secure State Department system and it failed to meet State Department – Clinton’s department & Clinton’s rules – requirements, federal law, and it was hacked as proof positive that Secretary Clinton was taking abnormally high security risks on a daily basis for the entire time she was in office. Unauthorized use of the home-brew server and e-mail system installed in her basement diverted 100% of State Department email (including Top Secret and Secret) communications and caused exceptionally grave danger to America.  

Factually, Secretary Clinton’s practices would be unacceptable to any company or corporation in the world where there is a concern for protecting its propriety documents, patents, copyrights and trademarks or other property, people and assets.

Clinton said that she was cooperating with the investigation and declared that she was happy to “talk to anybody, anytime” about the matter and would encourage her staff to do the same; and that she had permission for creating and using the home-brew server in her house; that she had not transmitted any classified email, handheld, laptop or other electronic messages; that she had turned over all of her emails; and that no rules were broken. All lies according to the inspector general’s review and facts that were previously discovered.  Whereas, Clinton ignored clear directives and she never sought approval to conduct government business over private email, and never demonstrated to the State Department that the server or the Blackberry she used while in office “met minimum information security requirements.”

Clinton’s open public server was reported as probably hacked during her trip to Asia in 2009 (see famous picture of Hillary using her Blackberry during that trip above), and hacked on two occasions in one day in 2011, but these security breaches were never reported according to the law.

Secretary Clinton and her key aides refused to be interviewed in the investigation.  No one asked for permission to use her home server and system.  In fact when two State Department employees complained about her email, cell phone, lap top and other hand held devices setup to a manager in the IT department, they were told that Clinton had permission to use the system, and to not speak of Clinton’s email again.  During the investigation this manager clammed up and lawyered up.

The OIG documents according to a report show just how inconsistent Secretary Clinton’s email practices were as compared to other Secretaries (Albright, Rice, and Powell) and senior officials at the State Department over a period of years. Whereas the cyber security systems increased in security and sophistication over time from Secretary to Secretary; Secretary Clinton’s personal system and practices were as rudimentary as a citizen would operate personally, and as such the rudimentary system Secretary Clinton and her aides used that was outside of a secure State Department system failed to meet federal Records Act and espionage laws did cause exceptionally grave danger to America.  

Secretary Clinton’s practices would be unacceptable to any company or corporation in the world where there is a concern for protecting its propriety documents, patents, copyrights and trademarks or other property and assets.

At a time when cyber security concerns heightened; when hacking into the system was discovered; and when Secretary Clinton was advised in writing that her practices were questioned; Clinton failed to assist with a security inquiry (2011). Secretary Clinton brazenly established a home-brew server and mobile devices, and then with top aides both inside the State Department (Mills, Sullivan, and Abedin), and outside the State Department (Blumenthal); transmitted and received secret and top secret communications on the open insecure public system.  Secretary Clinton set-up and operated an open and insecure system from (January 21, 2009 to February 24, 2014) that in fact was hacked by foreign sources.  

Because Secretary Clinton continually: a) acted above the law, b) evaded federal procedures, laws and guidelines, c) avoided Government storage and Public Records Requests, and d) due to Clinton’s disregard for security protocols allowed both a foreign individual (Romanian ‘Guccifer’ Marcel Lehel Lazar) and at least one hostile government (Russia); as well as probably (Asian) hostile sources were permitted to breach American top secret and secret security information.  

These security breaches by Secretary Clinton placed both American human and physical assets in exceptionally grave danger; and as a result of published personnel movements and ill protection of State Department personnel (Ambassador Stevens), and assets which more than likely led to the attack on the Conciliate in Benghazi Libya (2011) where four Americans were killed.

As a result of these acts, as a minimum Secretary Clinton should lose her security clearance rendering her unable to hold a government office.  

For the security breach: the lawfully required result under Title 18 of the U.S. Code of the Espionage Act in sections 793, 798 and 1001. Experts contacted by the DCNF say these could serve as the foundation for any criminal prosecution of Clinton or her aides.

For a substantial fine, a sentence of 10 years; and

For the resulting attack on Benghazi, 5 years house arrest, and the forfeiture of government pension and benefits. 


Clinton – Talk to anybody at anytime:

Notably, current Secretary of State John Kerry, and his predecessors Madeleine Albright, Colin Powell, and Condoleezza Rice, cooperated with the OIG… but Hillary Clinton and her highly controversial top aides Cheryl Mills, Jake Sullivan, and Huma Abedin did not. That’s a massive scandal, bordering on a national embarrassment, in its own right.



Within OIG Report concerning Permission:
In March 2015, Clinton described her email set-up as a “matter of convenience,” and insisted, “It was allowed.”
But the report, which was formally released Thursday, said investigators found no evidence Clinton “requested or obtained guidance or approval” to conduct official business on her personal email account or server despite having an “obligation” to discuss this. The report said had she notified the appropriate offices, they would not have approved her “exclusive reliance” on a personal account.

Within OIG Report Email from OIG Report that was not previously disclosed by Secretary Clinton:
–In November 2010, Secretary Clinton and her Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations discussed the fact that Secretary Clinton’s emails to Department employees were not being received. The Deputy Chief of Staff emailed the Secretary that “we should talk about putting you on state email or releasing your email address to the department so you are not going to spam.” In response, the Secretary wrote, “Let’s get separate address or device but I don’t want any risk of the personal being accessible.”

Within OIG Report concerning Hacks Detected:
“On January 9, 2011, the non-Departmental adviser to President Clinton who provided technical support to the Clinton email system notified the Secretary’s Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations that he had to shut down the server because he believed ‘someone was trying to hack us and while they did not get in I didn’t [sic] want to let them have the chance to,’” the report says. “Later that day, the advisor again wrote to the Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations, ‘We were attacked again so I shut [the server] down for a few min.’”
That matter should have been reported, the report says, but was not.
“Notification is required when a user suspects compromise of, among other things, a personally owned device containing personally identifiable information,” it says. “However, OIG found no evidence that the Secretary or her staff reported these incidents to computer security personnel or anyone else within the Department.”

Date of Benghazi Attack:
The Benghazi Libya Conciliate attack was on September 11, 2012 (the anniversary of 9/11/2001).  Islamic terrorist commit attacks on the anniversary of dates dear to America.
The September 11 attacks (also referred to as 9/11)[nb 1] were a series of four coordinated terrorist attacks by theIslamic terrorist group Al-Qaeda on the United States on the morning of Tuesday, September 11, 2001. The attacks consisted of suicide attacks used to target symbolic U.S. landmarks.

Definition of Top Secret Data:
Top Secret classification level “shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security.”

Disclosure of Top Secret Data:
22 Hillary Clinton emails declared ‘top secret’ by State Dept. – POLITICO…/22-hillary-clintonemailsdeclared-topsecret-2184…
Jan 29, 2016 – 22 Hillary Clinton emails declared ‘top secret‘ by State Dept. … that can cause “exceptionally grave” damage to national security if disclosed.





Did Clinton’s loose lips blow counterterror ops?

Bill Johnson, previously a political adviser to the U.S. Pacific Command, claimed that on two occasions, the loose communications policies of Clinton and her immediate staff may have allowed U.S. targets to get away.

“We had good intel. We knew where he was,” says Johnson, who worked in U.S. Air Force special operations with Army Green Beret and Navy SEAL units for more than 25 years before joining the State Department in 1999. “He would be gone three hours before, sometimes as little as a half-hour before” the counterterrorism teams moved in. “We knew he was getting tipped off somehow. We just didn’t know why.”

“Johnson says he and his team eliminated the possibility of other security leaks before settling on the unprotected telephone calls of the secretary of state and her aides as the likely source,” reportedNewsweek.


Judge Andrew Napolitano explained to Martha MacCallum on “America’s Newsroom” that the audit directly contradicts Clinton’s defense in the FBI’s investigation into her private email server.

“The heart of her defense was that she complied with all State Department regulations and what the FBI has been doing is just a security review,” Judge Napolitano said. “This was the security review … a review of how the State Department keeps safe the secrets entrusted to it. And Mrs. Clinton flunked that review.”

Former law enforcement and intelligence officials contacted by TheDCNF agree if there is wrongdoing, it is likely prosecutors will focus on the classified documents.

The most serious charges are felonies cited in Title 18 of the U.S. Code of the Espionage Act in sections 793, 798 and 1001. Experts contacted by TheDCNF say these could serve as the foundation for any criminal prosecution of Clinton or her aides.

Section 793 applies to anyone who has been “entrusted” with information relating to the national defense. The law applies to a federal official who “through gross negligence permits” information “to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, to be lost, stolen, abstracted or destroyed.”

Section 798 applies to any government official who “knowingly and willfully communicates” information “to an unauthorized person.” Section 1001 addresses giving “false statements.”

Clinton and her aides also could be charged under section 1924, which is a misdemeanor. This was the April, 2015, charge former CIA Director David Petraeus negotiated with prosecutors for sharing classified information with a mistress who also served as his biographer.

Read more:

Any One Of These Four Laws Could Put Hillary, Aides In Jail – See more at:

Newly Released Benghazi Emails Lead Directly to White House – See more at:

Judicial Watch Lawsuit Uncovers New Hillary Clinton Email Withheld from State Department – See more at:

Emails Reveal Hillary had YouTube Block Benghazi Videos – See more at:

Email Shows Hillary Clinton Knew Classified Material Was On Her Server – See more at:

Bombshell: In Newly-Released Email, Hillary Orders Aide to Strip Classified Marking – See more at:



Reliable Information on Climate Change

  Today’s media climate leads to confusion

With so much information available online, trying to figure out which information is credible — and what is not — is a real challenge. When so much of what we read falls outside of our own expertise, how can we know which headlines and news articles are consistent with science?

Scientific reference to Reliable information on Climate Change


Texas city hatches real estate deal with church to cross out atheists’ lawsuit

WHY WE LOVE TEXAS…“I want to make it perfectly clear to the citizens of Port Neches specifically that this mayor and this city council will not fold, it will not bend, it will not roll over,” Johnson told reporters. “We’re going to fight this all the way. And if it goes to court, then it goes to court. And we’ll fight it there as well.”

A $100 real estate deal ended a Constitutional crisis in a small Texas city.

Portland school board bans climate change-denying materials

What makes you think that we are not living in tyranny? Climate change is junk science. Vote for Trump!!

In a move spearheaded by environmentalists, the Portland Public Schools board unanimously approved a resolution aimed at eliminating doubt of climate change and its causes in schools.

“It is unacceptable that we have textbooks in our schools that spread doubt about the human causes and urgency of the crisis,” said Lincoln High School student Gaby Lemieux in board testimony. “Climate education is not a niche or a specialization, it is the minimum requirement for my generation to be successful in our changing world.”

Environmental groups say science is clear, so textbooks should be, too, Local News, Portland local News, Breaking News alerts for Portland city.