I Know the Name of the Spy the FBI Put in the Trump Campaign

Posted by Jimmy Minnish on May 14, 2018 under Links | Be the First to Comment


RUSH: I now know who the spy is. I know now know who the FBI was running in the Trump campaign. I don’t think I’m gonna give you the name of the spy, but I’m gonna tell you everything the spy has done. It is the most amazing story. It is a story of entrapment. When you hear this, it’s gonna infuriate you. You’re gonna realize how utterly phony this entire investigation of Donald Trump is. It’s phonier than you even realize now.

And there is a CliffsNotes version of this, and there is the intricate detailed version of this. I’m gonna give you the CliffsNotes version when we get into this. The name of the spy, you may not know it, it’s not somebody when you hear the name, “Oh, that person.” It’s not that kind of person. Even to call the person a spy is a little bit of a stretch. It’s more like an operative employed by the FBI to basically entrap somebody who worked with the Trump campaign in a peripheral way, and it worked like a charm.

And it all involved the name George Papadopoulos. Does the name George Papadopoulos ring a bell? George Papadopoulos is the so-called second reason the Mueller investigation or the FBI investigation into Trump colluding with Russia began. The first reason we were given was Carter Page. A FISA warrant, as you know, was secured to spy on Carter Page because of the Steele dossier. But nothing came of Mr. Page. Read more of this article »

New Evidence of Obama’s Deep-State Collusion? — The Patriot Post

Posted by Jimmy Minnish on March 29, 2018 under Links | Be the First to Comment

New information has emerged from text messages between those two now-infamous FBI lovebirds, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, suggesting that former Obama White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, former Democrat Senate Leader Harry Reid (NV) and former CIA Director John Brennan were coordinating on the Donald Trump/Russia collusion conspiracy and subsequent FBI investigation.

A GOP congressional source explained to Fox News, “We are not making conclusions. What we are saying is that the timeline is concerning enough to warrant the appointment of an independent investigator to look at whether or not the Obama White House was involved” in the Trump/Russia investigation.

“These texts seem to show FBI officials were briefing the Obama WH on the early stages of the Trump campaign investigation in 2016. How much did the Obama WH know? Were they involved?” tweeted Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC), who chairs the House Freedom Caucus.

Congressional investigators noted the CIA and FBI are supposed to be “independent agencies,” and “coordination between political actors at the White House and investigators would be inappropriate.” As we have long surmised, Barack Obama’s DOJ was involved in both the effort to exonerate Hillary Clinton and apparently in crafting and pressing the whole Trump/Russia collusion conspiracy. Slowly, these deep-state actors’ names are rising to the surface.

Meanwhile, Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz has announced that he will be opening up an investigation into allegations of possible abuse of the FISA court by FBI agents. While no specific reference was made to the FBI’s surveillance of members of Trump’s campaign team, the broader language hints that this is exactly what Horowitz will be investigating. However, the IG’s investigation will be limited in that he is able to subpoena only those who are currently employed by the government, which means that neither former FBI Director James Comey nor former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe will be forced to testify.

And speaking of Comey, the disgraced former FBI chief has been given top billing by CNN in an upcoming town hall event to launch his new book, A Higher Loyalty: Truth, Lies & Leadership. Clearly, Comey has no concerns about staking out an obvious political position. Or maybe Comey just wanted to ensure that he wouldn’t face any hardball questions over why he chose to exonerate Clinton.


Obamagate:  The Spin of Sedition

Posted by Jimmy Minnish on February 10, 2018 under Links | Be the First to Comment

Megan Barth imageBy —— Bio and ArchivesFebruary 10, 2018

Obamagate:  The Spin of Sedition, A Timeline of Sedition
“I bought all the presidents men. Figure i needed to brush up on watergate.” —Text message from Lisa Page to her lover, FBI Director of Counter Intelligence, Peter Strozk.

With all the memos and hot hair flying around these days in Washington DC, one word that has been noticeably absent is the word SEDITION.

According to our laws, Seditious conspiracy occurs when two or more persons conspire to overthrow, put down or to destroy by force the government of the United States and those found guilty shall be fined and/or imprisoned up to 20 years.  As defined by Webster’s Dictionary, Sedition is incitement of resistance to, or insurrection against, lawful authority.

 Resist. Insist. Persist. Enlist.

Resistance.  Where have I heard that before?

Oh yes, from the leaders and members of the Democrat Party, their activists and supporters, and even Hillary Clinton, who, in an interview with CNN last year, described herself as “part of the resistance.” Her new mantra is Resist. Insist. Persist. Enlist.

Yet, the facts show that Hillary was not just a part of the resistance after her campaign, she was actually leading the resistance by having her DNC law firm and opposition research firm contract a foreign agent, Christopher Steele, who then worked with Russians agents to craft a phony dossier—which then was used to initiate a counter intelligence spy operation on the Trump Campaign. In common sense circles, this is called Wiretapping. The Democrats need you to believe it was only multiple extensions of an existing surveillance operation of Carter Page. Yet, these warrants created an unlimited dragnet—affecting any and everyone associated with the Trump campaign.  Back in April of 2017, the FISA court foundthat 85% of the Obama’s FBI and DOJ 704-5 FISA searches were illegal and illegal provided to government outsiders—other wise known as the mainstream media. The withholding or presenting false evidence to the FISA court is in and of itself a crime.

Who was in charge of the counter intelligence spy operation?  That would be a married man sleeping with a FBI lawyer, and the same man in charge of the Hillary Clinton server/email investigation, Peter Strzok, who not only was all in for Hillary and a Never Trumper, but was the FBI Deputy Assistant Director of the Counter Intelligence division.  Peter referred to the dossier as an “insurance policy” which would then be used in case Trump won the election. Peter’s boss was James Comey.

James Comey, who lied to congress and leaked federal records to the press, told then president-elect Donald Trump that the dossier was salacious and not verifiable, yet Comey used the unverifiable dossier to obtain FISA warrants. James Comey knew Christoper Steele was a liar, but used this false evidence for surveillance warrants.  According to the memo, Comey signed three FISA applications in question on behalf of the FBI, and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe signed one. Sally Yates, then-Acting Deputy Attorney General Dana Boente, and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein signed one or more of the applications on behalf of the Justice Department.

“Unwittingly” or likely wittingly, Obama’s DOJ and FBI used false evidence to surveille and #Resist the Trump administration.  The FBI and Christopher Steele then used the press to spread a disinformation campaign to build the resistance against the incoming Trump administration, The phony dossier was then used to open a criminal investigation the Trump Administration. The criminal investigator, special counsel Robert Mueller, was assigned by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein….the very same Rod who signed off on a FISA application on behalf of Obama’s DOJ.

Each of these conspirators, including the suddenly quiet Barack Obama, need to be held accountable according to the rule of law.  Yet, who within our agencies will uphold their constitutional duty to bring these felons to justice?  Rod Rosenstein?  Laughable.  The Democrats have accused Republicans of treason simply for wanting President Obama’s socialist agenda to fail. If anything is treason, then nothing is treason.  If intent is written into the espionage statute, then mishandling classified information is legal.

The spin of this sedition by elected Democrat leaders, activists and operatives is textbook speak of the radical Left.

For in the words of Hillary Clinton’s mentor, Saul Alinsky,

“Accuse your opponent of what only you are doing, as you are doing it, to create confusion, cloud the issue, and inoculate voters against any evidence of your guilt.”